Biophysical and economic importance of the ecosystem service of flood regulation on the agricultural sector: Ameca-Mascota Basin, Jalisco, and Jamapa Basin, Veracruz

Authors

  • Daniel Revollo-Fernández Área de Crecimiento y Medio Ambiente, Departamento de Economía, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Azcapotzalco / Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencia y Tecnología, Ciudad de México, México https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6350-0924
  • Debora Lithgow Red de Ambiente y Sustentabilidad, Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, México https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5740-9980
  • Juan José von Thanden Laboratorio de Planeación Ambiental, Departamento El Hombre y su Ambiente, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco, Ciudad de México, México https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6560-752X
  • María del Pilar Salazar-Vargas Posgrado en Ciencias de la Sostenibilidad, Unidad de Posgrado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5183-1275
  • Aram Rodríguez de los Santos Dirección de Economía Ambiental y de Recursos Naturales, Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático, Ciudad de México, México https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2102-2848

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24850/j-tyca-2025-05-06

Keywords:

Economic valuation, flood regulation, agricultural sector, watersheds

Abstract

The ecosystem service of flood regulation is a crucial benefit derived from the inherent capacity of ecosystems to retain water and mitigate the velocity of currents that occur during and after precipitation events. In this study, we assessed flood regulation service from biophysical and economic perspectives, focused on the impacts on the agricultural sector within two distinct watersheds in Mexico: Ameca-Mascota, which drains into the Pacific, and Jamapa, which drains into the Gulf of Mexico. In the Ameca-Mascota watershed, an estimated area ranging from 231 to 557 km2 would be flooded, affecting agricultural land between 120 and 332 km2. Similarly, within the Jamapa watershed, an area of approximately 926 to 1 370 km2 would face inundation, leading to the potential loss of crops across an area of 481 to 548 km². Then, the annual production losses for each watershed were calculated to understand the economic implications of these flood events. In the case of Ameca-Mascota, the projected losses ranged from US$ 8.3 million to US$ 67 million, while the Jamapa watershed was expected to suffer losses between US$ 11 million and US$ 88 million. These results underscore the significant vulnerability of these regions to flood-related disturbances, including the substantial economic burden that flood-induced damages pose to the agricultural sector. Also, the outcomes provide valuable insights that can inform and strengthen watershed management practices.

References

Barth, N. C., & Döll, P. (2016). Assessing the ecosystem service flood protection of a riparian forest by applying a cascade approach. Ecosystem Services, 21(Part A), 39-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.012

Brander, L., Brouwer, R., & Wagtendonk, A. (2013). Economic valuation of regulating services provided by wetlands in agricultural landscapes: A meta-analysis. Ecological Engineering, 56, 89-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.104

Briner, S., Elkin, C., & Huber, R. (2013). Evaluating the relative impact of climate and economic changes on forest and agricultural ecosystem services in mountain regions. Journal of Environmental Management, 129(15), 414-422. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.018

Cenapred, Centro Nacional de Prevención de Desastres. (2018). Informe de actividades 2018. Recuperado de https://www.cenapred.unam.mx/es/Publicaciones/archivos/406-INFORMEDEACTIVIDADES2018.PDF

Cenapred, Centro Nacional de Prevención de Desastres. (2004). Inundaciones. Recuperado de https://www.cenapred.unam.mx/es/Publicaciones/archivos/42.pdf

Cenapred, Centro Nacional de Prevención de Desastres. (2020). Impacto socioeconómico de los principales desastres ocurridos en México. Recuperado de https://www.cenapred.unam.mx/es/Publicaciones/archivos/455-RESUMENEJECUTIVOIMPACTO2020.PDF

Daily, G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, T. H., Salzman, J., & Shallenberger, R. (2009). Ecosystem services in decision making: Time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1), 21-28. DOI: 10.1890/080025

Da-Silva-Anjinho, P., Takaku, L. Y. R. B., Barbosa, C. C., Periotto, N. A., Hanai, F. Y., & Mauad, F. F. (2022). Analysis of susceptibility to degradation of water ecosystem services as a tool for land use planning: A case study in a small Brazilian watershed. Environmental Management, 70(6), 990-1003. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-022-01710-y

De-Groot, R., Fisher, B., & Christie, M. (2010). Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. In: TEEB (eds). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: The ecological and economic foundations. London, UK: Earthscan, Routledge.

Folch, R. (ed.). (1993). Mediterrànies, Volum 5. En: Enciclopèdia Catalana. España: Grup Enciclopèdia.

Fu, Q., Li, B., Hou, Y., Bi, X., & Zhang, X. (2017). Effects of land use and climate change on ecosystem services in Central Asia's arid regions: A case study in Altay Prefecture, China. Science of the Total Environment, 607-608, 633-646. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.241

INECC, Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático. (2020). Catálogo y revisión de metodologías de análisis económico para la adaptación al cambio climático. Documento de trabajo. Ciudad de México, México: Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático. Recuperado de https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/599904/74_2020_Catalogo_y_revision_de_metodologias_AEA_DEARN.pdf

Lawrence, C. B., Pindilli, E. J., & Hogan, D. M. (2019). Valuation of the flood attenuation ecosystem service in difficult run, VA, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 231, 1056-1064. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.023

Manson, R. H. (2004). Los servicios hidrológicos y la conservación de los bosques de México. Madera y Bosques, 10(1), 3-20. DOI: 10.21829/myb.2004.1011276

Martínez-García, V., Martínez-Paz, J. M., & Alcon, F. (2022). The economic value of flood risk regulation by agroecosystems at semiarid areas. Agricultural Water Management, 266, 107565. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107565

Mitsch, W. J., & Gosselink, J. G. (2000). The value of wetlands: Importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecological Economics, 35(1), 25-33. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00165-8

Olander, L., Johnston, R. J., Tallis, H., Kagan, J., Maguire, L., Polasky, S., Urban, D., Boyd, J., Wainger, L., & Palmer, M. (2015). Best practices for integrating ecosystem services into federal decision making. Durham, UK: National Ecosystem Services Partnership, Duke University. Recuperado de https://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/sites/default/files/publications/es_best_practices_fullpdf_0.pdf

Ochoa-Cardona, V. (2015). Herramientas para el análisis y modelado de servicios ecosistémicos tendencias espacio-temporales y desafíos futuros. Recuperado de https://repository.javeriana.edu.co/handle/10554/17165

Polasky, S. (2012). Valuing nature: Economics, ecosystems services, and decision-making. In: Measuring nature balance sheet of 2011 ecosystem services seminar series. Palo Alto, USA: Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. Recuperado de https://www.moore.org/materials/Ecosystem-Services-Full-Seminar-Series.pdf

Pickup, M., McDougall, K. L., & Whelan, R. J. (2003). Fire and flood: Soil‐stored seed bank and germination ecology in the endangered Carrington Falls Grevillea (Grevillea rivularis, Proteaceae). Austral Ecology, 28(2), 128-136. DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01255.x

Ruiz-Agudelo, C. A., Hurtado-Bustos, S. L., & Parrado-Moreno, C. A. (2020). Modelling interactions among multiple ecosystem services. A critical review. Ecological Modelling, 429, 109103. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109103

Schirpke, U., Kohler, M., Leitinger, G., Fontana, V., Tasser, E., & Tappeiner, U. (2017). Future impacts of changing land-use and climate on ecosystem services of mountain grassland and their resilience. Ecosystem Services, 26(Part A), 79-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.008

Smithers, R., Korkeala, O., Whiteley, G., Brace, S., & Holmes, B. (2016). Valuing flood-regulation services for inclusion in the UK ecosystem accounts. Ricardo Energy & Environment for UK Office for National Statistics. Recuperado de https://www.ons.gov.uk/file?uri=/economy/environmentalaccounts/methodologies/naturalcapital/valuingforfloodregulation.pdf

Teng, Y., Zhan, J., Liu, W., Chu, X., Zhang, F., Wang, C., & Wang, L. (2022). Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services trade-offs among ecosystem service bundles in an alpine mountainous region: A case-study in the Qilian Mountains, Northwest China. Land Degradation & Development, 33(11), 1846-1861. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4266

Turner, B. L., Janetos, A. C., Verbug, P. H., & Murray, A. T. (2013). Land system architecture: Using land systems to adapt and mitigate global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 23(2), 395-397. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.009

Wang, T., Lin, J., Chen, Z., Megharaj, M., & Naidu, R. (2014). Green synthesized iron nanoparticles by green tea and eucalyptus leaves extracts used for removal of nitrate in aqueous solution. Journal of Cleaner Production, 83(15), 413-419. DOI. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.006

Watson, K. B., Ricketts, T., Galford, G., Polasky, S., & O'Niel-Dunne, J. (2016). Quantifying flood mitigation services: The economic value of Otter Creek wetlands and floodplains to Middlebury, VT. Ecological Economics, 130, 16-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.015

Woodland Trust. (2017). The economic benefits of woodland. Recuperado de https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/publications/2017/01/economic-benefits-of-woodland/

Zhang, M., Zhao, X., Voss, C., & Zhu, G. (2016). Innovating through services, co-creation and supplier integration: Cases from China. International Journal of Production, 171(Part 2), 289-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.09.026

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

Revollo-Fernández, D., Lithgow, D., von Thanden, J. J., Salazar-Vargas, M. del P., & Rodríguez de los Santos, A. (2025). Biophysical and economic importance of the ecosystem service of flood regulation on the agricultural sector: Ameca-Mascota Basin, Jalisco, and Jamapa Basin, Veracruz. Tecnología Y Ciencias Del Agua, 16(5), 226–256. https://doi.org/10.24850/j-tyca-2025-05-06