Aplicación de técnicas de detección de cambios en el uso y la cobertura del suelo en la cuenca del río Pao, Venezuela, usando imágenes de satélites Landsat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24850/j-tyca-2026-03-09Palabras clave:
uso de la tierra, teledetección, cuencas hidrográficas, cartografía, recursos hídricos, degradación ambiental, VenezuelaResumen
En esta investigación se aplicaron técnicas de variación espacio-temporal de cobertura y uso en la cuenca del río Pao, localizada espacialmente en territorio venezolano, mediante procesamiento de imágenes satelitales. Se adquirieron 11 imágenes de satélite desde satélites Landsat: L5TM, L7ETM SLC (Scan Line Corrector, por sus siglas en inglés)-on, L8OLI. Las técnicas para detección de cambios han sido posclasificación y preclasificación aplicadas entre imágenes de dos fechas: 1986-2016; 1990-2016; 1991-2016, 1998-2016, 1999-2016, 2000 SLC:on-2016, 2001-2016, 2002 SLC:on-2016, 2003 SLC:on-2016, 2015-2016. Se aplicaron siete métodos de preclasificación y uno de posclasificación. La categorización de métodos de preclasificación en orden del más al menos exacto para estimación de proporción de área de cambio/ningún cambio bitemporal en coberturas y usos terrestres en la cuenca del río Pao obtenida a partir de matriz de error y ajuste de métodos a características locales de escena en imagen del satélite Landsat dieron como resultado: 1) análisis de componentes principales, 2) diferencia de imágenes de reflectancia, 3) transformación Kauth-Thomas, 4) vector de cambio, 5) relación de imágenes de reflectancia, 6) diferencia de imágenes de índice de vegetación de diferencia normalizada y 7) regresión de imágenes de reflectancia. En el método de posclasificación, la diferencia de área correspondiente a la cuenca del río Pao entre 1986 (fecha 1) y 2016 (fecha 2) dio los siguientes resultados en clases: urbano, -1.37 %; agropecuario, -22.99 %; agrícola, 1.12 %; agua, 0.55 %; vegetación, 8.1 %; suelo degradado, 9.66 %; nubes, 2.49 %; sombras, 2.28 %. El método posclasificación ha sido la opción predominante con respecto a métodos de preclasificación.
Referencias
Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E., Roach, J., & Witmer, R. (1976). A landa-use and land-cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Washington, DC, USA: United States Government Printing Office. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp964
Araya, Y. H., & Hergarten, C. (2008). A comparison of pixel and object-based land cover classification: A case study of the Asmara region, Eritrea. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 100, 233-243. https://doi.org/10.2495/GEO080231
Bukata, R. P., Jerome, J. H., Kondratyev, K. Y., Pozdnyakov, D. V., & Kotykhov, A. A. (1997). Modelling the radiometric color of inland waters: Implications to a) remote sensing and b) limnological color scales. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 23(3), 254-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(97)70910-9
Bukata, R. P., Jerome, J. H., Borstad, G. A., Brown, L. N., & Gower, J. F. (2004). Mitigating the impact of trans-spectral processes on multivariate retrieval of water quality parameters from case 2 waters. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(1), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.5589/m03-046
Byrne, G. F., Crapper, P. F., & Mayo, K. K. (1980). Monitoring land-cover change by principal component analysis of multitemporal Landsat data. Remote sensing of Environment, 10(3), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(80)90021-8
Chan, J. C. W., Chan, K. P., & Yeh, A. G. O. (2001). Detecting the nature of change in an urban environment: A comparison of machine learning algorithms. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67(2), 213-226. http://hdl.handle.net/10722/118210
Chander, G., Markham, B. L., & Helder, D. L. (2009). Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sensing of Environments, 113(5), 893-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.007
Chen, X., Chen, J., Shi, Y., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2012). An automated approach for updating land cover maps based on integrated change detection and classification methods. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 71, 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.05.006
Cakir, H. I., Khorram, S., & Nelson, S. A. (2006). Correspondence analysis for detecting land cover change. Remote Sensing of Environment, 102(3-4), 306-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.023
Collins, J. B., & Woodcock, C. E. (1996). An assessment of several linear change detection techniques for mapping forest mortality using multitemporal Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 56(1), 66-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(95)00233-2
Crist, E. P., & Kauth, R. J. (1986). The tasseled cap de-mystified. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 52(1), 81-86. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19860037907
DeGloria, S. D., Laba, M., Gregory, S. K., Braden, J., Ogurcak, D., Hill, E., Fegraus, E., Fiore, J., Stalter, A., Beecher, J., Elliot, R., & Weber, J. (2000). Conventional and fuzzy accuracy assessment of land cover maps at regional scale. In: Heuvelink, G. B. M., Lemmens, M. J. P. M. (eds.). Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences (pp. 153-160). Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University Press.
De-Márquez-Farías, B. E. & Márquez-Romance, A. M. (2023). Flood risk management sustainable plan in the Pao River basin, Carabobo state, from a community perspective (Doctoral thesis). University of Carabobo, Valencia, Venezuela. http://riuc.bc.uc.edu.ve/handle/123456789/9479
Foody, G. M., & Mathur, A. (2004). Toward intelligent training of supervised image classifications: Directing training data acquisition for SVM classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 93(1-2), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.06.017
Foody, G. M. (2002). Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment 80, 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00295-4
Giri, C., Zhu, Z., & Reed, B. (2005). A comparative analysis of the Global Land Cover 2000 and MODIS land cover data sets. Remote Sensing of Environment, 94(1), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.09.005
Guevara, E., & Cartaya, H. (2004). Hydrology: An Introduction to Applied Hydrological Science. Valencia, Venezuela: University of Carabobo.
Guerschman, J. P., Paruelo, J. M., & Burke, I. C. (2003). Land use impacts on the normalized difference vegetation index in temperate Argentina. Ecological Applications, 13(3), 616-628. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0616:LUIOTN]2.0.CO;2
Han, L., & Rundquist, D. C. (1997). Comparison of NIR/RED ratio and first derivative of reflectance in estimating algal-chlorophyll concentration: A case study in a turbid reservoir. Remote Sensing of Environment, 62(3), 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00106-5
Huang, C., Wylie, B., Yang, L., Homer, C., & Zylstra, G. (2002). Derivation of a tasselled cap transformation based on Landsat 7 at-satellite reflectance. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(8), 1741-1748. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160110106113
Hussain, M., Chen, D., Cheng, A., Wei, H., & Stanley, D. (2013). Change detection from remotely sensed images: From pixel-based to object-based approaches. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 80, 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.03.006
INE, Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas. (2014). XIV Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda. https://ine.gob.ve/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Censo-Nacional-2011.pdf
Ingebritsen, S. E., & Lyon, R. J. P. (1985). Principal components analysis of multitemporal image pairs. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 6(5), 687-696. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168508948491
Jensen, J. R. (2009). Remote sensing of the environment: An earth resource perspective (2nd ed.). Noida, India: Pearson Education India.
Joseph, G. (2005). Fundamentals of remote sensing. Hyderabad, India: Universities Press.
Karaska, M. A., Huguenin, R. L., Beacham, J. L., Wang, M. H., Jensen, J. R., & Kaufmann, R. S. (2004). AVIRIS measurements of chlorophyll, suspended minerals, dissolved organic carbon, and turbidity in the Neuse River, North Carolina. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70(1), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.70.1.125
Kauth, R. J., & Thomas, G. S. (1976). The tasselled cap. A graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat. In: LARS symposia (p. 159). West Lafayette Indiana, USA: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
Kontoes, C. C. (2008). Operational land cover change detection using change vector analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(16), 4757-4779. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160801961367
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 33(2), 363-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529786
Lillesand, T., Kiefer, R. W., & Chipman, J. (2014). Remote sensing and image interpretation. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.5555/1215632
Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brondízio, E., & Moran, E. (2004). Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(12), 2365-2401. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143116031000139863
Lunetta, R. S., Lyon, J. G., Guindon, B., & Elvidge, C. D. (1998). North American landscape characterization dataset development and data fusion issues. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 64, 821-828. https://ostrnrcan-dostrncan.canada.ca/handle/1845/256499
Malila, W. A. (1980). Change vector analysis: An approach for detecting forest changes with Landsat. In: LARS symposia (p. 385). West Lafayette, Indiana, USA: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.-Purdue University.
Markham, B. L., & Barker, J. L. (1985). Spectral characterization of the LANDSAT Thematic Mapper sensors. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 6(5), 697-716. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168508948492
Mas, J. F. (1999). Monitoring land-cover changes: A comparison of change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(1), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311699213659
Nackaerts, K., Vaesen, K., Muys, B., & Coppin, P. (2005). Comparative performance of a modified change vector analysis in forest change detection. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(5), 839-852. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143116032000160462
Nelson, R. F. (1983). Detecting forest canopy change due to insect activity using Landsat MSS. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 49(9), 1303-1314. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19830065547
Richter, R., & Schläpfer, D. (2019). Atmospheric and topographic correction (ATCOR theoretical background document). DLR IB, 1, 0564-03. https://www.rese-apps.com/pdf/atcor_atbd.pdf
Otukei, J. R., & Blaschke, T. (2010). Land cover change assessment using decision trees, support vector machines and maximum likelihood classification algorithms. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 12, S27-S31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2009.11.002
Rouse Jr., J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., & Deering, D. W. (1974). Paper a 20. In: Third earth resources technology satellite-1 symposium: The proceedings of a symposium held by Goddard space flight center at Washington, DC (Vol. 351, p. 309). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19740025760/downloads/19740025760.pdf
Sedano, F., Gong, P., & Ferrao, M. (2005). Land cover assessment with MODIS imagery in southern African Miombo ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment, 98(4), 429-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.009
Sinha, P., & Kumar, L. (2013). Independent two-step thresholding of binary images in inter-annual land cover change/no-change identification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 81, 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.03.010
Singh, A. (1989). Review article digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10(6), 989-1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168908903939
Sohl, T. L. (1999). Change analysis in the United Arab Emirates: An investigation of techniques: Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. USGS Publications Warehouse, 65(4), 475-484. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70186963
Townshend, J., Justice, C., Li, W., Gurney, C., & McManus, J. (1991). Global land cover classification by remote sensing: Present capabilities and future possibilities. Remote Sensing of Environment, 35(2-3), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90016-Y
Trodd, N. M. (1995). Uncertainty in land cover mapping for modelling land cover change. In: Proceedings of RSS95 remote sensing in action. Lincoln, UK: Remote Sensing Society.
Ung, C.-H., Lambert, M.-C., Guidon, L., & Fournier, R. A. (2000). Integrating Landsat-TM data with environmental data for classifying forest cover types and estimating their biomass. In: Heuvelink, G. B. M., Lemmens, M. J. P. M. (eds.). Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences (pp. 659-662). Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University Press.
Vogelmann, J. E., & Rock, B. N. (1988). Assessing forest damage in high-elevation coniferous forests in Vermont and New Hampshire using Thematic Mapper data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 24(2), 227-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90027-2
Yuan, F., Sawaya, K. E., Loeffelholz, B. C., & Bauer, M. E. (2005). Land cover classification and change analysis of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) Metropolitan Area by multitemporal Landsat remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 98(2-3), 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.006
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Tecnología y ciencias del agua

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Por Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional. Basada en una obra en https://www.revistatyca.org.mx/. Permisos que vayan más allá de lo cubierto por esta licencia pueden encontrarse en Política editorial






